Four problems every platform hits after the pilot.
The pilots proved the rails work. Production means every participant's systems agree with them, every day.
Fixed-income lifecycle, as data
Thirteen of Acacia's twenty use cases were fixed income. We turn allocation, coupons, transfers, repo legs and redemption on the token ledger into lifecycle events your registry, servicing and accounting systems can rely on. The issuer and its agents still perform them; we make sure every system records them the same way.
Every money leg, reconciled
Whether the cash leg is wCBDC, ESA-settled, a deposit token or a regulated stablecoin, each one leaves records in a different place. We track DvP and PvP legs across the token platform, the settlement asset and the bank side, and surface breaks with the evidence to resolve them.
Ledger sync across rails
Connectors and ledger synchronisation between permissioned networks, public chains and the systems around traditional FMIs (RITS, Austraclear, CHESS). Designed up front, so it isn't next year's integration problem.
Inside your boundary
Participant data stays where it is allowed to live: our cloud, your VPC, on-premises, or embedded in your platform. We see only the participant view you authorise. Custody, keys and execution stay with you and your licensed providers.
Three starting points, depending on where you sit.
If you built or ran an Acacia use case
- Turn the pilot's ledger activity into lifecycle events and reports your clients' registry, custody and accounting systems can consume.
- Stop rebuilding the same integration backend for every participant that joins.
- Run reconciliation between the token ledger, the settlement asset and participants' books continuously, not at period end.
If you're a tokenisation or DLT platform
- Give every participant the same connectors, ledger sync and reconciliation, embedded in your product or deployed alongside it.
- Connect to RITS- and Austraclear-linked systems and core ledgers with a clear settlement and reconciliation path.
- Handle wCBDC, deposit-token and stablecoin legs in one model instead of one integration per money type.
If you're a bank or FMI
- Get tokenised-asset activity from the platforms you use into your books and records, reconciled against custody and cash.
- Keep participant data inside your security boundary, limited to the view you are authorised to see.
- Work through the platform or systems integrator you already use. We can deliver inside their engagement.
What this looks like in practice.
Engineers, not advisors.
What we leave behind is built to be implemented: data models, connectors, reconciliation rules, reference code. Your team picks up where we stop, or we keep building. Nothing gets laminated.
Vendor-neutral by construction.
We're not paid by a chain, a stablecoin issuer, or an FMI. What we recommend is what we'd build, not what we'd resell.
Acacia-fluent, regulator-fluent.
We speak the vocabulary the report and the regulator use (ESAs, wCBDC, ASIC ERS, DFMI sandbox) so the design lands in the room without translation.
Let's build